Philips Morris V Uruguay
Arb 10 7 expand collapse all applicable iia.
Philips morris v uruguay. Arb 10 7 the long expected final award has been rendered in the high profile case initiated by tobacco giant philip morris in early 2010 against uruguay over its tobacco. Oriental republic of uruguay. And abal hermanos s a.
Oriental republic of uruguay icsid case no. Gary born arbitrator judge james crawford arbitrator secretary of the tribunal. This short article considers the implications for public health of the award in the investment treaty dispute philip morris v uruguay challenging certain tobacco control measures of uruguay including in relation to graphic health warnings.
The company complained that uruguay s anti smoking legislation devalued its cigarette trademarks and investments in the country and was suing uruguay for compensation under the bilateral. And abal hermanos s a. 17 abal also used a number of uruguayan trademarks registered in its own name to sell tobacco products.
Key cases from the 2010s and on this website on october 18 2018. And abal hermanos s a. Uruguay to receive us 7 million reimbursement philip morris brands sàrl philip morris products s a.
Uruguay philip morris brands sàrl philip morris products s a. Pmp was the owner of the marlboro fiesta l m and philip morris trademarks which it licensed to abal. Caso philip morris contra uruguay started on 19 february 2010 when the multinational tobacco company philip morris international filed a complaint against uruguay.
18 in particular abal sold the marlboro fiesta l m philip morris casino and premier brands of cigarettes in uruguay. The article also takes account of the jurisdictional decision in that dispute and the decision in philip. Philip morris brands sàrl philip morris products s a.
